![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
| Should I Stay or Should I Go? | Radionica (Zagreb) no.1, January 2002 |
With the work GastARTbeiter (2000) Bulgarian artist Luchezar Boyadijev coined a term for a phenomenon of major significance. The work is based on the artist’s CV, displayed on one side of a wide panel which is covered with photographs, receipts, plane tickets, while on the other side there is a blown up photograph of the artist superimposed with Bulgarian exchange rates. The work was accompanied by a text in which he explains his motivations and calculates the amount of money spent on him by the ‘West’ in the last ten years. He goes on to speculate that it might have been ‘more honest and definitely better’ if all the money had been given to him to spend in Sofia rather than on turning him into ‘a cultural GastARTbeiter.’ Regarded by many critics as a crucial work for understanding the practices of the art world in the 1990s, Boyadijev succeeded in drawing attention to the problematic position of artists from Central and Eastern Europe, including the issue of their perception at home and abroad. The term GastARTbeiter has much resonance in Croatia, let us mention the exhibition of the same title showing the work of young Croatian artists active in Düsseldorf that was held recently in Zagreb and Osijek. The theme was also chosen as the topic of the round table discussion held during Borders 2001 in Slavonski Brod. The issue of artists choosing to live and work abroad gives rise to various reactions and emotions. These range from envy to pity, and, but rarely, understanding and sympathy. There are similarities between the situation of the GastARTbeiter and artists who are forced or choose to work in the national capital rather than in their native city or region. They are both liable to complex feelings of loyalty and nostalgia for their roots, as well as alienation. The concept itself is fluid and open to personal interpretation, and is linked to questions of borders and their transgression, geographical hierarchies in the context of the periphery and the centre, and the politics of migration. The conventional view of Gastarbeit is of East Europeans coming to West European countries, especially Germany, to do manual work. There is still something left of the original sense of Gastarbeit in the position of contemporary GastARTbeiters in the European Union, who are happy to take on jobs that they wouldn’t consider doing in their native country. Gastarbeit from the point of view of an artist, can also be seen as any work you have to do in order to support yourself, while artistic creation itself is not usually seen as Arbeit at all. Vlado Martek, for example, has described his position in the following way: ‘I’m a Gastarbeiter on the micro level. Until noon I’m a librarian and in the afternoon I’m an artist. I’m not a Gastarbeiter in the afternoon.’ This touches on the issue of artists who live from their art within the commercial art gallery system, whether at home or abroad, and are under obligation to constantly produce new work and meet deadlines. GastARTbeiters are justified in feeling disadvantaged by their situation.
One the one hand, it’s very hard for them to become completely
accepted in their adopted art world, while on the other they risk losing
contact with the art scene of their native country. They sometimes feel
unjustly neglected when it comes to exhibitions at home, while at the
same time exploited for their international connections. Branko Franceschi,
speaking from years of experience as a Zagreb gallerist, implies a more
symbiotic relationship between the GastARTbeiter and the gallery: ‘From
my point of view, it’s a beneficial relationship for both of us,
they’re kind of building their careers with us and we’re
kind of reaching our goals of making our scene more international through
them.’ Quotations of Branko Franceschi and Vlado Martek from the round table
on Gastarbeit at Borders2001 in Slavonski Brod. |
|
Maja and Reuben Fowkes |
copyright 2005 |